1Dept. of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
2Department of Environmental Health Engineering,School of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
3Social Health Determinants Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Background and aims: The removing of (potential) toxic heavy metal ions from sewage, especially in industrial and mining waste effluents, has been widely studied in recent years. The aim of present study was to investigate the various methods for lead removal of lead ions from industrial wastewater. Methods: This study was a review research. Data were collected through different databases in various articles. The various methods for lead removal from industrial wastewater were compared to each other. Results: The present study showed the various methods for lead removal from industrial wastewater including chemical precipitation, electrochemical reduction, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, membrane separation, and adsorption. Technical applicability, plant simplicity and cost-effectiveness are the key factors that play major roles in the selection of the most suitable treatment system for inorganic effluents. Conclusions: Adsorption is proposed as an economical and effective method for the retention of lead ions from aqueous industrial wastes because it is simple, effective and economic in removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution.
The removing of (potential) toxic heavy metal ions from sewage, especially in industrial and mining waste effluents, has been widely studied in recent years. Heavy metals contaminations could exist in wastes of many industries, such as metal plating, mining operations, tanneries, chloralkali, radiator manufacturing, smelting and alloy industries as well as storage battery industries.1-3
Another signiﬁcant source of heavy metals wastes may result from printed circuit board (PCB) manufactures .4 Tin, lead, and nickel solder plates are the most common used resistant’s over plates. Moreover, other sources for the metal wastes may include the wood processing industry (arsenic containing wastes produced by chromatid copper-arsenate wood treatment), inorganic pigment manufacturing (which may produce pigments containing chromium compounds and cadmium sulﬁde), petroleum reﬁning (which could generate conversion catalysts contaminated with nickel, vanadium, and chromium) and photographic operations (which might produce ﬁlm with high concentrations of silver and ferrocyanide).4-6 Because of the possibility of discharging large amounts of wastewater contaminated by metal, industries which bearing heavy metals, such as; Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, As, Pb, and Zn, could be considered as the most hazardous ones among the chemical-intensive industries.7,8 In addition, due to their high solubility in aquatic environments, heavy metals could be absorbed by living organisms. In fact, once they enter the food chain, a large concentration of heavy metals might be accumulated in the human body.9 If the metals are ingested beyond the permitted concentration, they could result in serious health disorders. Therefore, it is obligatory to treat metal contaminated wastewater before discharging into the environment.4,10
Lead is a heavy, soft, malleable, bluish grey metal.11 Lead is of particular interest, because of its toxicity and its widespread presence in the environment.12 Lead is a well-known highly toxic metal considered as a priority pollutant.13 It is an industrial pollutant, which enters the ecosystem through soil, air and water. Lead is a systemic poison causing anaemia, kidney malfunction, tissue damage of brain and even death in extreme poisoning situation.11,14 It is very toxic in nature. Generally speaking, lead pollution, spreading over earth and ground water, comes from natural sources and industrial effluents.4,15,16 Processing industries, such as acid battery manufacturing, metal plating and ﬁnishing, ammunition, tetraethyl lead manufacturing, ceramic and glass industries and environmental clean-up services treat and disposal of lead contaminated water are the major sources of lead pollution.17,18 The presence of high levels of lead in the environment may cause long-term health risks to humans and ecosystems.11,16 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the maximum permissible limit (MPL) of lead in drinking water is 0.05 mg/L. The permissible limit (mg/L) for Pb (II) in wastewater, given by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is 0.05 mg/L.17,19 In industrial wastewaters, lead-ion concentrations approach 200–500 mg/L; this concentration is very high in relation to water quality standards, and lead-ion concentration of wastewaters must be reduced to a level of 0.05–0.10 mg/L before discharging to water ways or sewage systems.19-21 Hence proper treatment of industrial wastewaters which are releasing lead into the aquatic and land systems is very important.22 To mitigate the lead ions pollution, many processes like adsorption, precipitation, coagulation, ion exchange, cementation, electro-dialysis, electro-winning, electro-coagulation and reverse osmosis have been developed.4,7,23
Some above mentioned methods are described briefly as follows: Precipitation is the most common method for removing lead ions up to parts per million (ppm) levels from water. Since the lead ions salts are insoluble in water, when the correct value is added, precipitation caused. This process is cost-eﬀective and its eﬃciency is aﬀected by low pH and the presence of other salts (ions). The process requires addition of other chemicals, which ﬁnally leads to the generation of a high water content sludge, the disposal of which is cost intensive. Precipitation with lime, bisulphite or ion exchange lacks the speciﬁcity and is ineﬀective in removal of the lead ions at low concentration.23,24
Ion exchange is another method used successfully in the industry for the removal of lead ions from eﬄuents. Though it is relatively expensive when compared to the other methods, it has the ability to achieve ppb levels of clean up while handling a relatively large volume. An ion exchanger is a solid capable of exchanging either cations or anions from the surrounding materials. Commonly used matrices for ion exchange are synthetic organic ion exchange resins. The disadvantage of this method is that it cannot handle concentrated metal solution as the matrix gets easily fouled by organics and other solids in the wastewater. Moreover ion exchange is nonselective and is highly sensitive to pH of the solution.23,24
Electro-winning is widely used in the mining and metallurgical industrial operations for heap leaching and acid mine drainaging. It is also used in metal transformation and electronics and electrical industries for removal and recovery of lead ions. Metals like Ag, Au, Cd, Co, Cr, Ni, Pb, Sn and Zn present in the eﬄuents can be recovered by electro-deposition using insoluble anodes.23
Electro-coagulation is an electrochemical approach, which uses an electrical current to remove lead ions from solution. Electro-coagulation system is also eﬀective in removing suspended solids, dissolved metals, tannins and dyes. The contaminants present in wastewater are maintained in solution by electrical charges. When these ions and other charged particles are neutralized with ions of opposite electrical charges provided by electro-coagulation system, they become destabilized and precipitated in a stable form.23,25
Cementation is a type of another precipitation method implying an electrochemical mechanism in which a metal having a higher oxidation potential passes into solution e.g. oxidation of metallic iron, Fe (0) to ferrous iron (II) to replace a metal having a lower oxidation potential. Copper is mostly separated by cementation along with noble metals such as Ag, Au and Pb as well as As, Cd, Ga, Pb, Sb and Sn can be recovered in this manner.23
Reverse osmosis and electro-dialysis involves the use of semi-permeable membranes for the recovery of lead ions from dilute wastewater. In electro-dialysis, selective membranes (alternation of cation and anion membranes) are ﬁtted between the electrodes in electrolytic cells, and under continuous electrical current, the associated ion migrates, allowing the recovery of lead ions.23,26
The choice of treatment depends on effluent characteristics such as concentration of lead, pH, temperature, flow volume, biological oxygen demand, the economics involved and the social factor like the standard set by government agencies.11 The precipitation process is usually not sufficient to reduce lead concentration to the level required by water quality standard.12 Although these methods are expensive and they are also associated with several limitations such as generation of sludge, low percentage retention of metal ions, energy consumption and low selectivity which makes the process less suitable for small scale industries. Thus adsorption is proposed as an economical and effective method for the retention of lead ions from aqueous industrial wastes.17,27 However, adsorption on to the surface of activated carbon is the most widely used method.11
The present study showed the various methods for lead removal from industrial wastewater including chemical precipitation, electrochemical reduction, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, membrane separation, and adsorption. Recently, numerous approaches have been studied for developing cheaper and more effective technologies, both to decrease the amount of produced wastewater and to improve the quality of the treated effluent. Adsorption has become one of the alternative treatments, in recent years; the search for low-cost adsorbents that have metal-binding capacities has been intensiﬁed. Although many techniques can be employed for treatment of wastewater with heavy metals, it is important to note that the selection of the most suitable treatment for metal contaminated wastewater depends on some basic parameters such as pH, initial metal concentration, the overall treatment performance compared to other technologies, environmental impacts as well as economic parameters such as the capital investment and operational costs. Finally, technical applicability, plant simplicity and cost-effectiveness are the key factors that play major roles in the selection of the most suitable treatment system for inorganic effluents. All the factors mentioned above should be taken into consideration in selecting the most effective and inexpensive treatment in order to protect the environment.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
We are grateful to thank all people who kindly helped us in conducting this research.
1. Kiani G, Soltanzadeh M. High capacity removal of silver (I) and lead (II) ions by modified polyacrylonitrile from aqueous solutions. Desalin Water Treat. 2014; 52(16-18): 3206-18.
2. Lim AP, Aris AZ. A review on economically adsorbents on heavy metals removal in water and wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2014; 13(2): 163-81.
3. Kadirvelu K, Thamaraiselvi K, Namasivayam C. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from an agricultural solid waste. Bioresour Technol. 2001; 76(1): 63-5.
4. Barakat M. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem. 2011; 4(4): 361-77.
5. Sorme L, Lagerkvist R. Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm. Sci Total Environ. 2002; 298(1-3): 131-45.
6. Ghasemi M, Naushad M, Ghasemi N, Khosravi-fard Y. A novel agricultural waste based adsorbent for the removal of Pb (II) from aqueous solution: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. J Ind Eng Chem. 2014; 20(2): 454-61.
7. Al-Shannag M, Al-Qodah Z, Bani-Melhem K, Qtaishat MR, Alkasrawi M. Heavy metal ions removal from metal plating wastewater using electrocoagulation: Kinetic study and process performance. Chem Eng J. 2015; 260: 749-56.
8. Mubarak N, Sahu J, Abdullah E, Jayakumar N. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Rev. 2014; 43(4): 311-38.
9. Dhir B. Potential of biological materials for removing heavy metals from wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014; 21(3): 1614-27.
10. Babel S, Kurniawan TA. Cr (VI) removal from synthetic wastewater using coconut shell charcoal and commercial activated carbon modified with oxidizing agents and/or chitosan. Chemosphere. 2004; 54(7): 951-67.
11. Acharya J, Kumar U, Meikap B. Thermodynamic characterization of adsorption of lead (II) ions on activated carbon developed from tamarind wood from aqueous solution. S Afr J Chem Eng. 2013; 18(1): 70-6.
12. Abdel-Halim SH, Shehata AM, El-Shahat MF. Removal of lead ions from industrial waste water by different types of natural materials. Water Res. 2003; 37(7): 1678-83.
13. Mondal MK. Removal of Pb (II) ions from aqueous solution using activated tea waste: Adsorption on a fixed-bed column. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90(11): 3266-71.
14. Singha B, Das SK. Removal of Pb (II) ions from aqueous solution and industrial effluent using natural biosorbents. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012; 19(6): 2212-26.
15. Hu J, Zhao D, Wang X. Removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from aqueous solution using multiwalled carbon nanotubes/iron oxide magnetic composites. Water Sci Technol. 2011; 63(5): 917-23.
16. Dong L, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Zhao J. Removal of lead from aqueous solution by hydroxyapatite/ magnetite composite adsorbent. Chem Eng J. 2010; 165(3): 827-34.
17. Goel J, Kadirvelu K, Rajagopal C, Kumar Garg V. Removal of lead (II) by adsorption using treated granular activated carbon: batch and column studies. J Hazard Mater. 2005; 125(1-3): 211-20.
18. Momčilović M, Purenović M, Bojić A, Zarubica A, Ranđelović M. Removal of lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto pine cone activated carbon. Desalin. 2011; 276(1): 53-9.
19. Ucun H, Bayhana YK, Kaya Y, Cakici A, Algur OF. Biosorption of lead (II) from aqueous solution by cone biomass of Pinus sylvestris. Desalin. 2003; 154(3): 233-8.
20. Özacar M, Şengil İA, Türkmenler H. Equilibrium and kinetic data, and adsorption mechanism for adsorption of lead onto valonia tannin resin. Chem Eng J. 2008; 143(1): 32-42.
21. Vilar VJ, Botelho CM, Boaventura RA. Influence of pH, ionic strength and temperature on lead biosorption by Gelidium and agar extraction algal waste. Process Biochem. 2005; 40(10): 3267-75.
22. Singanan M, Abebaw A, Vinodhini S. Removal of lead ions from industrial waste water by using biomaterials: A novel method. Bull Chem Soc Ethiop. 2005; 19(2): 289-94.
23. Ahluwalia SS, Goyal D. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98(12): 2243-57.
24. Dean JG, Bosqui FL, Lanouette KH. Removing heavy metals from waste water. Environ Sci Technol. 1972; 6(6): 518-22.
25. Hunsom M, Pruksathorn K, Damronglerd S, Vergnes H, Duverneuil P. Electrochemical treatment of heavy metals (Cu2+, Cr6+, Ni2+) from industrial effluent and modeling of copper reduction. Water Res. 2005; 39(4): 610-6.
26. Singh D, Tiwari A, Gupta R. Phytoremediation of lead from wastewater using aquatic plants. J Agric Technol. 2012; 8(1): 1-11.
27. Thavamani SS, Rajkumar R. Removal of Cr (VI), Cu (II), Pb (II) and Ni (II) from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption on Alumina. Res J Chem Sci. 2013; 2231: 606X.