Document Type : Review article


1 Department of Immunology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran

2 Department of Immunology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.

3 Department of Immunology, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran

4 shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, shahrekord, Iran


Background and aims: Vitamins are essential constituents of our diet that Longley have been known to influence the immune system. Vitamin D3 and B9 have received particular attention in recent years as these vitamins have been shown to have an unexpected and crucial effect on the immune response. 1, 25(OH)2D3 metabolizing enzymes and vitamin D receptor (VDR) are present in many cell types including various immune cells such as antigen-presenting-cells, T cells, B cells.
Methods: In this mini review, we study 30 novel articles since 2009 to 2015 about the essential roles of vitamins in modulating a broad range of immune processes, such as lymphocyte activation, T-helper-cell differentiation and regulation of the immune response.
Results: 1, 25(OH)2D3 has direct effect on CD4+ T (T-helper) cells for suppressing various cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-21 and IL-22, while enhancing the regulatory Tcells. In vitro studies show that Treg cells could be differentiated from naive T cells in vitamin B9-reduced condition.
Conclusions: These findings provide a new link between diet and the immune system, which could maintain the immunological homeostasis and clarify the beneficial roles of vitamins in informing the design of vitamin analogs as pharmacologic agents for the generation and maintenance of a healthy immune condition.


Main Subjects


Vitamins are organic compounds that the host organism cannot synthesize in sufficient quantities and that therefore need to be supplied exogenously by the diet or commensal bacteria. Some vitamins (e.g. vitamin B family and vitamin C) are water-soluble, whereas others (e.g., vitamins A, D, E, and K) are hydrophobic. Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic vitamins and their metabolites have diverse functions in many biologic events, including immunologic regulation responses is better. than regulation. Indeed, vitamin deficiency results in high susceptibility to infection and immune diseases.1 Until the mid-1930s, when the first commercial yeast-extract vitamin B complex and semi-synthetic vitamin C supplement tablets were sold, vitamins were obtained solely through food intake, and changes in diet (which, for example, could occur during a particular growing season) usually greatly altered the types and amounts of vitamins ingested. However, vitamins have been produced as commodity chemicals and made widely available as inexpensive semisynthetic and synthetic-source multivitamin dietary and food supplements and additives, since the middle of the 20th century. Thirteen vitamins are universally recognized at present. Vitamins are classified by their biological and chemical activity, not their structure. The largest number of vitamins, the B complex vitamins, function as precursors for enzyme cofactors, that help enzymes in their work as catalysts in metabolism.2 In this role, vitamins may be tightly bound to enzymes as part of prosthetic groups: For example, biotin is part of enzymes involved in making fatty acids. They may also be less tightly bound to enzyme catalysts as coenzymes, detachable molecules that function to carry chemical groups or electrons between molecules. For example, folic acid may carry methyl, formyl, and methylene groups in the cell. Although these roles in assisting enzyme-substrate reactions are vitamins' best-known function, the other vitamin functions are equally important. Previously vitamins were thought to regulate the immune system in an indiscriminant manner, but accumulating evidence has revealed specific functions of individual vitamins and their metabolites in immune responses.3

Vitamin D is a group of fat soluble vitamins responsible for absorption of calcium and phosphate in the small intestine and stimulates osteoclast differentiation.4 Two major forms of vitamin D exist. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol), found in plants, is produced by ultraviolet B irradiation of ergosterol and can be consumed as a supplement or in fortified foods.5 Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is synthesized in the human epidermis or consumed in the form of natural (for example, fish) or fortified food sources or as a supplement.4 Despite its name, vitamin D is not really a vitamin, it is the precursor to the potent steroid hormone calcitriol (also known as 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), which mediates numerous actions in many tissues of the body.6 Cutaneous vitamin D3 generated by high energy UVB photons provides 90% of the human vitamin requirement. The biological half-life of 25-OHD3 is 2 months, so this metabolite effectively integrates sunlight’s energy signal over time.7 With the finding of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in nearly every tissue and the more recent discovery of thousands of VDR binding sites throughout the genome controlling hundreds of genes, the interest in vitamin D and its impact on multiple biologic processes has accelerated tremendously as evidenced by the thousands of publications each year for the past several years.5

In the human skin, cholecalciferol is synthesized from 7-dihydrocholesterol when exposed to UVB. The production of vitamin D3 (D3) in the skin is not an enzymatic process. Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is produced through a two-step process in which the B ring is broken by UV light (spectrum 280-320 UVB) radiation from the sun, forming pre-D3 that isomerizes to D3 in a thermosensitive but noncatalytic process.8 Cholecalciferol is biologically inactive and immediately binds to vitamin D binding proteins or albumin.9 It then enters the circulation and is hydroxylated in the liver, catalyzed by the enzymes CYP2R1 and CYP27A1, which results in the production of the inactive form 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25 (OH)D) which represents the main circulating vitamin D metabolite and is the most reliable parameter to define human vitamin D status.10 In the kidney, 25 (OH)D is further converted to the circulating biologically active compound calcitriol (1, 25(OH)2D) by the enzyme 1-α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) which is under strict control of parathyroid hormone and the phosphaturic hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23).11 Calcitriol levels are tightly regulated in a renal negative feedback loop, including inhibition of CYP27B1 by high levels of calcitriol and FGF-23 and stimulation of the enzyme CYP24A1 (24-hydroxylase) which metabolizes calcitriol into the inactive, water soluble form, calcitroic acid, which is then excreted in the bile.12 Circulating levels of calcitriol are mainly determined by renal CYP27B1 activity.13 However, other cell types including immune cells, also express CYP27B1 and are able to convert the inactive, circulating form 25(OH)D into the active hormone in an autocrine or paracrine manner. Especially in immune cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, a lack of feedback mechanisms compared to kidney cells allows the production of high local concentrations of calcitriol needed for immune modulation.14

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a transcription factor and member of the steroid hormone and nuclear hormone receptor family. The VDR was identified in 1969 and its crystal structure was cloned in 1987 and binding to its natural ligand were characterized in 2000.15 Since its discovery, researchers have detected the VDR in many tissues of the body, including bone, pancreatic β cells, parathyroid gland, brain, skin, prostate, testes, heart, skeletal muscle tissue, breast, liver, lung, intestine, kidneys, adipose cells and immune response cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells and activated B- and T-cells.16 It is comprised of 3 domains: the N-terminal DNA binding domain with two zinc fingers that bind to the grooves of the DNA at discrete sites (VDREs), the C-terminal ligand binding domain, and the hinge region binding of these two domains together. The ligand binding domain structure has been solved by x-ray crystallography.17 It is comprised of 12 helices. The terminal helix serves as a gating mechanism closing around the incorporated ligand and forming an interface for coactivators as well as facilitating the interaction of VDR with its heterodimer partner, generally RXR. Although VDR preferentially binds to RXR, creating a VDR-RXR dimer, VDR can also bind other receptors of the nuclear receptor superfamily, which include thyroid, vitamin A, PPAR-γ and other orphan receptors.18 The VDR-RXR dimer can regulate genes in several systems and tissues. Although there is substantial variability in quence of VDREs, the most prevalent motif for the VDRE sequence consists of two half-sites, each with the six-nucleotide consensus sequence, GGTCCA, separated by 3 other nucleotides of any sequence. This motif is known as Direct Repeat 3 (DR3), although other configurations of VDRE-binding sites, including DR6 and DR4, exist in some vitamin D-regulated genes.19 VDR binding to its VDRE then recruits coregulatory complexes required for its genomic activity. These complexes can be both gene and cell specific, enabling the selectivity of 1,25(OH)2D action from cell type to cell type. These complexes include a subunit that directly binds to the VDR generally through an LXXLL motif along with a number of subunits that contain enzyme activity such as histoneacetyl transferases (coactivators such as the SRC family) ordeacetylases (corepressors such as SMRT and NCoR), methyl transferases and demethylases, ATPase-containing nucleosomal-remodeling activity (SWI/SNF), and links to RNA polymerase II.5

In common with natural killer cells (NK) and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (cytotoxic T-cells), macrophages and their monocyte precursors play a central role in initial non-specific immune responses to pathogenic organisms or tissue damage-so called cell-mediated immunity. Consistent with the earlier seminal observations of extra renal 1α-hydroxylase activity in patients with sarcoidosis, the effects of vitamin D on macrophage function have been central to many of the new observations implicating vitamin D in the regulation of immune responses. Their role is to phagocytose pathogens or cell debris and then eliminate or assimilate the resulting waste material. In addition, macrophages can interface with the adaptive immune system by utilizing phagocytic material for antigen presentation to T-lymphocytes (T-cells).

For many years, the key action of vitamin D on macrophages was thought to be its ability to stimulate differentiation of precursor monocytes to more mature phagocytic macrophages.20,21 This concept was supported by observations showing differential expression of VDR and 1α-hydroxylase during the differentiation of human monocytes macrophages.22 The latter report also emphasized early studies showing that normal human macrophages were able to synthesize 1,25(OH)2D3 when stimulated with interferon gamma (IFN-γ). Localized activation of vitamin D, coupled with expression of endogenous VDR was strongly suggestive of an autocrine or intracrine system for vitamin D action in normal monocytes/macrophages. However, confirmation of such a mechanism was only obtained in 2006 when Robert Modlin and colleagues carried out DNA array analyses to define innate immunity genes that were specifically modulated in monocytes by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb). In a seminal investigation both the VDR and the gene for 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) were shown to be induced following activation of the principal pathogen recognition receptor for M. tb, toll-like receptor 2/1 (TLR2/1.23 Subsequent experiments confirmed that precursor 25OHD3 was able to induce intracrine VDR responses in monocytes that had been treated with a TLR2/1 activator. In particular, the TLR2/1–25OHD3 combination stimulated expression of the antibacterial protein cathelicidin, so that vitamin D was able to promote monocyte killing of M. tb. Notably, the ability to promote expression of the antibacterial protein following a TLR2/1 challenge was directly influenced by the 25OHD3 status of the donor serum used for monocyte culture. More recently, scientists have shown that vitamin D supplementation in vivo can also enhance TLR2/1-induced cathelicidin expression. Cathelicidin was identified several years ago as a target for transcriptional regulation by 1,25(OH)2D3-liganded VDR, in that its gene promoter contains a functional vitamin D response element (VDRE).24 Interestingly, this VDRE occurs within a small interchangeable nuclear element (SINE) sequence which only appears to be present in the cathelicidin gene promoter of higher primates, suggesting that vitamin D regulation of this facet of innate immunity is a relatively recent evolutionary development.25

Recent reports have not only underlined the importance of cathelicidin as a target for vitamin D but also suggest that this mechanism may be more complex than initially thought. As yet, the precise signal system by which TLR activation induces expression of VDR and 1α-hydroxylase remains unclear. Promoter-reporter analysis of the events involved in transcriptional regulation of CYP27B1 suggests that TLR4-mediated induction of the enzyme involves JAK-STAT, MAP kinase and nuclear factor kapa β (NF-κβ) pathways, and that these synergize with IFN-γ mediated induction of CYP27B1.26 However, other studies have proposed that TLR2/1 induction of 1α-hydroxylase occurs indirectly as a consequence of TLR2/1 induced interleukin-15 (IL-15) which is a potent inducer of CYP27B1 and 1α-hydroxylase activity.27 In a similar fashion, interleukin 17A (IL-17A) has been shown to enhance 1,25(OH)2D3 mediated induction of cathelicidin, although this response does not appear to involve transcriptional regulation of 1α-hydroxylase or increased VDR sensitivity.28

Regulation of the antibacterial protein by 1,25(OH)2D3 has been described for a wide variety of cell types other than macrophages, including keratinocytes, lung, epithelial cells, myeloid cell lines, and placental trophoblasts.29,30 In some cases, this appears to involve an intracrine response similar to that reported for monocytes. However, the mechanisms controlling local synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D3 in these cells vary considerably. In keratinocytes, low baseline expression of 1α-hydroxylase is enhanced following epidermal wounding by transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ).31 The resulting rise in 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations upregulates expression of TLR2 and TLR4 by keratinocytes, thereby priming these cells for further innate immune responses to pathogens or tissue damage. By contrast, in trophoblasts, induction of cathelicidin and subsequent bacterial killing by 25OHD3 appears to be due to constitutive 1α-hydroxylase activity, which is not further enhanced by TLR activation. The latter may be due to the rapid non-immune induction of 1α-hydroxylase and VDR which occurs within the placenta during early gestation.32

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen presenting cells (APCs) are important in initiating CD4+ T cells responses. Expression of VDR by purified tissue DCs was first reported in 1987. Subsequent studies using populations of DCs isolated from skin (Langerhans cells) provided evidence that 1,25(OH)2D3 could act to attenuate antigen presentation.33 In functional studies, 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment of human DCs in vitro results in reduced expression of the cost imulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 and decreased expression of HLA-DR and the maturation marker CD83, all associated with an immature DC phenotype.34

Vitamin D inhibits differentiation and maturation of human DCs invitro by suppressing the IL-12 production from DCs and increasing IL-10 production.35 This is an important immunosuppressive activity as IL-12 is an important cytokine in inducing Th1 development.34 1,25(OH)2D3 inhibits the differentiation, maturation, and immune stimulatory capacity of DCs. Canning et al. confirm that 1,25(OH)2D3 suppresses monocyte differentiation into DCs, thereby generating immature DCs. This suppresses DC ability to stimulate T-cell proliferation.36 Most of the direct immune modulatory properties of 1,25(OH)2D3 on DCs are proposed to occur in myeloid (mDCs) and not plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). A study by Penna and et al. suggest that although both primary human blood-derived mDCs and pDCs express comparable levels of VDR and upregulate the primary response gene CYP24 upon culture with 1,25(OH)2D3, only the tolerogenic properties of mDCs are modulated upon culture with 1,25(OH)2D3.37 1,25(OH)2D3 negatively regulates the differentiation, maturation, and immune stimulatory capacity of DCs by decreasing the expression of MHC class II, CD40, CD80, and CD86.38 In addition, 1,25(OH)2D3 decreases the synthesis of
IL-6, IL-12, and IL-23.39

The other major type of adaptive immune cells, T cells, is also thought to be an important target for the immune modulatory effects of different forms of vitamin D. The development of lymphocytes takes place in the thymus with VDR being expressed in medullary thymocytes but not in the less mature cortical thymocytes. However, once cells leave the thymus and enter the circulation as T or B cells VDR expression is lost until these cells are activated to proliferate by mitogens Indeed, 1,25D is a potent inhibitor of T-cell proliferation, blocking the transition from early G1 phase to late G1 phase, but having no effect on transition from Go (resting) to early G1 or from late G1 to S phase. Weak TCR signaling via the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 pathway induced VDR expression. The T cells subsequently
up-regulated phospholipase C-gamma1 (PLC-γ1) expression 75-fold , enabling them to flux calcium and become fully activated. PLC-γ1 induction appeared to be
VDR-dependent. The dependence of T cell activation on VDR expression has not been demonstrated in vivo.40

VDR expression by these cells is very low in resting conditions but upon activation and proliferation, T and B cells up-regulate VDR expression significantly, allowing regulation of up to 500 vitamin D responsive genes which influence differentiation and proliferation of these cells.41 Since 1983 it has been described that 1,25(OH)2D inhibited T cell proliferation and the secretion of select cytokines after mitogen stimulation four potential mechanisms by which vitamin D may influence T cell function have been proposed: 1) direct, endocrine effects on T cells mediated via systemic calcitriol. 2) Direct, intracranial conversion of 25(OH)D to calcitriol by
T cells. 3) Direct, paracrine effects of calcitriol on T cells following conversion of 25(OH)D to calcitriol by monocytes or dendritic cells. 4) Indirect effects on antigen presentation to T cells mediated via localized APC affected by calcitriol.

In principle, vitamin D exposure leads to a shift from a pro inflammatory to a more tolerogenic immune status, including very diverse effects on T cell subtypes: Calcitriol suppresses T helper (Th) cell proliferation, differentiation and modulates their cytokine production.42 In particular, treatment of
T cells with calcitriol or analogs inhibits the secretion of pro inflammatory Th1 [IL2, interferon-γ (IFN- γ), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF- α)], Th9 (IL9) and Th22 (IL22) cytokines,43 but promotes the production of more anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokines (IL3, IL4, IL5, IL10).44,45 The decrease in the production of IL-2 and IFNγ by 1,25(OH)2VD3 is partially mediated by binding of the VDR–RXR complex to the VDRE in the promoters of genes encoding IL-2. IL17 producing Th17 cells are also affected by vitamin D. Inhibition of Th17 activity seems to play a major role in the treatment of autoimmune diseases as shown in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice.46 Recently, calcitriol was found to directly suppress IL17 production on a transcriptional level,47 and activated human T-cells exposed to calcitriol produced significantly decreased levels of IL17, interferon-γ and IL21.48 The same study also revealed a change toward a tolerogenic phenotype, including increased expression of genes typicaland regulatory markers FOXP3, CTLA-4, and IL-10 for regulatory T cells (Tregs), by adding a combination of calcitriol and IL2 to human primary T cell cultures. In addition, 1,25(OH)2D upregulated the gut homing receptor CCR9 and inhibited CXCR3 on T cells potentially changing the homing properties of the Th cells.49 Vitamin D and 1,25(OH)2D inhibited Th1 and Th17 responses, induced T reg responses, and controlled proliferation and Th cell localization.39

INKT cells are also vitamin D targets .Development and function of iNKT cells depends on expression of the VDR and vitamin D.50,51 In vitro, 1,25(OH)2D inhibited iNKT cell derived IL-17 and induced IL-4 and IL-5. The requirement for the VDR in the development of iNKT cells was traced to regulation of the survival of maturing iNKT cells in the thymus. Vitamin D also controls iNKT cell expansion during development.51

Vitamin D has also been proposed as a regulator of Th2 mediated disease such as allergy and asthma. In vitro, 1,25(OH)2D treatment of T cells has been shown to increase IL-4 secretion by human and mouse Th cells.41,52 IL-13 has been shown to be induced or decreased by 1,25(OH)2D treatment of human T cells.53 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) is the inactive precursor of 1,25(OH)2D3 and is considered the best parameter for evaluation of the vitamin D status of a subject. The normal range of serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations is 25–170 Nm.54 The serum concentration of the active 1,25(OH)2D3 is approximately 1000-fold lower (60–110 pM) and far below the effective concentration of 1,25 (OH)2D3 found in in vitro studies. Thus, in most in vitro studies more than a 100-fold higher concentration of 1,25 (OH)2D3 than found in serum is often required to obtain an effect.55 It has therefore been suggested that the level of circulating 1,25(OH)2D3 is too low to affect immune responses in vivo, and that sufficient levels are obtained by local conversion of 25(OH)D3 to 1,25 (OH)2D3.10 In accordance, it has been shown that activated antigen presenting cells (APC) express the 25(OH) D-1α hydroxylase CYP27B1 that converts 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3, and that APC can produce 1,25(OH)2D3 from 25(OH)D3 in vitro and respond to this through the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in an autocrine fashion.23 Elevated levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 in association with hypercalcemia have been observed in patients with sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and other infections and inflammatory diseases in which the pathology is characterized by granuloma formation, supporting the hypothesis that activated macrophages can produce significant amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 in vivo.56 Like APC, activated T cells express the VDR and CYP27B1.7 However, whether T cells can convert 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 in physiological relevant concentrations and respond to this in an autocrine fashion is a matter of debate. Most studies on the effect of vitamin D on
T cells have not addressed this question as they investigated the direct effects of
supra-physiological concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 and not how 25(OH)D3 affects T cell responses. One study has shown that isolated T cells have the ability to convert 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH) 2D3 in concentrations that actually affect vitamin D responsive genes in an autocrine fashion.40 In agreement, scientists found that purified CD4+ T cells have the ability to produce substantial amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 when activated in the presence of 25(OH)D3.57 In contrast, another recent study found that although activated T cells do express CYP27B1, the expression level is not sufficiently high to allow production of 1,25(OH)2D3 in concentrations that affect vitamin D responsive genes. The authors found that 25(OH)D3 only affected T cell responses when APC were present, and suggested that APC locally secrete sufficient amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 to directly influence the surrounding T cells in a paracrine fashion. Other important players influencing the bioavailable levels of vitamin D are the vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) and albumin. 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 circulate bound to DBP
(85–90%) and albumin (10–15%) with less than 1% in their free form.58 Studies of DBP knock-out mice have shown that DBP acts as a vitamin D reservoir by protecting 25(OH)D3 and 1,25 (OH)2D3 from degradation and renal secretion.15 However, DBP also sequesters 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH) 2D3 and inhibits their action on monocytes, DC and keratinocytes in vitro.15 How DBP affects T cell responses to 25(OH)D3 still needs to be determined. The objectives of this study were to further elucidate whether T cells have the ability to convert 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 in proportions that affect a panel of vitamin D responsive genes in an autocrine fashion and to investigate how DBP regulates T cell responses to 25(OH)D3.

Like T-cells, active but not inactive B-cells express the VDR. Consequently, initial studies indicated that 1,25(OH)2D3 could directly regulate B-cell proliferation and immunoglobulin (Ig) production.59 In B-cells, anti-proliferative effects of calcitriol such as inhibition of differentiation, proliferation, initiation of apoptosis and decreased immunoglobulin production were initially considered to be exclusively indirectly mediated by T helper (Th) cells.60 expression of CYP27b1 was also detected in B-cells, indicating that B cells may be capable of autocrine/intracranial responses to vitamin D. More recent studies confirmed additional direct effects of calcitriol on B cell homoeostasis, including inhibition of memory- and plasma-cell generation, as well as promotion of apoptosis of immunoglobulin-producing B cells.61 This control on B cell activation and proliferation may be clinically important in autoimmune diseases as B-cells producing auto reactive antibodies play a major role in the pathophysiology of autoimmunity.12

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by a loss of immune homeostasis resulting in corrupted self-antigen recognition followed by the destruction of body tissue by auto reactive immune cells. A combination of genetic predisposition, epidemiological risk factors,62 and environmental contributors contributes to the development of autoimmune diseases. One important factor may be the availability of sufficient vitamin D levels as various epidemiological studies suggest associations between vitamin D deficiency and a higher incidence of autoimmune diseases, such as T1D, MS, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).63

In animal models for T1D, MS, SLE, IBD and autoimmune uveitis, administration of calcitriol either prevented or ameliorated autoimmunity. Studies with vitamin D deficient or VDR knock-out animals show increased inflammation and susceptibility to T1D and Crohn’s disease, disturbed T cell homing and lack of host protection from bacterial invasion and infection.64

Serum 25(OH)D is considered the most accurate marker for vitamin D status.65 While the Endocrine Society advocates that levels below 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) should define deficiency, levels ranging from 20 to 29.9 ng/mL (52–72 nmol/L) should define insufficiency and levels above 30 ng/mL
(75 nmol/L) should define sufficiency, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) considers levels of >20 ng/mL to be sufficient for the majority of the general population.49 This latter classification is based largely on vitamin D’s effects on bone and mineral homeostasis. The optimal 25(OH)D serum level regarding other aspects of human health is still under debate.66 For immune-mediated diseases, experts suggest that even higher serum 25(OH)D levels may be needed to lead to positive effects.67

Calcitriol is well known for its diverse pharmacological activities, including modulation of cell growth, neuromuscular and immune function and reduction of inflammation. Calcitriol and its analogs exert potent effects on cellular differentiation and proliferation regulate apoptosis and produce immune modulatory effects.68

Vitamin D has several important roles in the skin. Many in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate dose-dependent effects of vitamin D on cell proliferation and differentiation.11,69 Although the mechanisms that mediate the anti-proliferative and pro-differentiating effects of vitamin D analogs on keratinocytes are not completely understood, it is well known that these effects are at least in part genomic and mediated by VDRs (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3).11 Vitamin D can reduce the risk of skin infection through modulating the production of various antimicrobial peptides and the cytokine response.70 It is possible that vitamin D could enhance T helper type 2 responses. Vitamin D deficiency is related to a high number of skin disorders, including skin cancer, autoimmune skin disorders, photo dermatoses, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Vitamin D and its analogs have already been successfully used in the therapy of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, vitiligo, acne and rosacea.71 Most of the studies are devoted to treatment of psoriasis. The highly variable nature of psoriasis and its individual presentations in patients can make choosing the most appropriate treatment difficult. Currently available synthetic vitamin D analogs that have been found to be safe and effective in topical treatment of psoriasis include calcipotriol (or calcipotriene), max-acalcitol, tacalcitol and hexafluoro-1a, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.72 According to the literature, the rate of treatment success with vitamin D and its analogs varies from 4% to 53%,73 and many of them have significant adverse effects. Calcipotriol is considered as a highly effective topical agent for the treatment of hyper proliferative skin diseases, such as psoriasis.74 Calcipotriol exerts only negligible systemic effects on calcium homeostasis. Thus, eliminating the risk of the main significant side effects of hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia and bone calcium mobilize.75

The role of vitamin D and its analogs in cancer treatment and prevention was investigated in different research tracks including clinical and epidemiological studies. According to extensive epidemiological research reports,64 it was found that there is a clear association between various factors responsible for vitamin D levels in the body (e.g. geography and latitude, history of sun exposure, lifestyle) and increased morbidity from cancer. It was also found that vitamin D and its analogs inhibit proliferation of cancer cells derived from multiple tissues.76 Further studies are required to clarify the molecular mechanisms of the anticancer activity of vitamin D and its various analogs. From the current literature on the subject, it appears that the compound is not suitable for use in cancer as a single or primary anticancer agent but as an adjuvant in combination chemotherapy, where it can aid the actions of other cytotoxic agents, particularly those of the alkylating agents (which are not cell cycle specific). The anticancer vitamin D analogs include new calcipotriol-derived compounds, diastereomeric and geometric analogs of calcipotriol, seocalcitiol, 20-hydroxyvitamin D2 analog, 5-butyloxazole unit analog and additional analogs containing a structurally modified side chain.77-79 The dominant side effects of vitamin D, hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, resulted in limiting the use of vitamin D in cancer treatment.80 To overcome this problem, more than 3000 vitamin D analogs have been synthesized in recent years.81 Some of these analogs have been found to be more effective and less toxic than vitamin D, justifying their development and introduction to the market.82 BGP-13 and BGP-15, calcipotriol derived vitamin D3 analogs, are good examples of more-effective and less-toxic analogs than vitamin D.76 BGP-15 is a calcipotriol-based analog where the 24-OH has been substituted by a chloride atom on the side chain of the calcipotriol molecule. BGP-13 and BGP-15 have been shown to induce apoptosis and inhibit prostate and breast cancer growth in vitro and in mice in vivo.77 Antitumor effects of vitamin D and its analogs were also demonstrated in humans, when they were used either alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs Vitamin D activity is expressed also by causing tumor regression and inhibition of tumor growth, in addition to counteracting their mutagenic effect by inducing apoptotic cell death. Some evidence suggests that this vitamin could be used in high doses as a prophylactic agent for prevention of colorectal, prostate and breast cancer development. Only large-scale long-term research will reveal which vitamin D analogs, either alone or in combination with other drugs, could serve as effective therapeutic agents for cancer.83

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease characterized by the immune-mediated destruction of insulin-producing b cells from islets of Langerhans in the pancreas. As mentioned above, vitamin D plays a vital part in the normal functioning of the immune system and its deficiency could lead to impaired functioning of the immune system. It was shown that vitamin D mediates insulin secretion and glucose uptake,84 and also regulates insulin receptor gene expression. Epidemiological studies have shown a direct correlation between the increase in the prevalence of the disease and deficiency of vitamin D. The ability of a potent vitamin D analog: 2α-Methyl-19-nor-(20S)-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (2AMD), to prevent type 1 diabetes was determined in an Ins2/non-obese diabetic (NOD) model. 2AMD suppresses development of type 1 diabetes, preserves islet cells and has a significant impact on B cell survival and function.85 A detailed mechanism of antidiabetic activity of vitamin D in type 2 diabetes is unclear Lifestyle factors leading to type 2 diabetes, including obesity, aging and lack of physical activity. It can also cause vitamin D deficiency. It is only known that vitamin D regulates direct and indirect action on insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. Vitamin D can directly influence the muscle and fat cells, and can improve insulin action through reducing insulin resistance as well as reducing inflammation which is commonly present in patients with type 2 diabetes.86 A small-scale post hoc analysis of a bone study revealed that daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (700 IU) supplementation for three years prevented a further rise in fasting blood glucose in a subgroup with impaired fasting blood glucose (100–125 mg/dl) at a baseline.87

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and a common inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized with myelin loss, progressive neurological dysfunction, gliosis, and unstable degrees of axonal pathology that initiated by auto reactive T cells that recognize central nervous system antigens.88 Various genetic and environmental risk factors appear to interact and contribute to MS. In genetics, several human leukocyte antigen alleles (more particularly HLA-DRB1*1501) could favor the disease whereas others could be protective. Some of the genes involved in vitamin D metabolism (e.g. CYP27B1) also have a significant role in MS.89 Based on epidemiological studies, three environmental risk factors were identified: 1) previous Epstein-Barr virus infection 2) vitamin D insufficiency 3) and cigarette smoking. Some clinical findings strongly suggest that vitamin D status influences the relapse rate and radiological lesions in MS patients. It was suggested that changes in vitamin D serum concentrations are correlated with MS.90 Although the results of adequately powered randomized clinical trials using vitamin D supplementation have not yet been reported, vitamin D is a promising candidate as modulator of disease activity in MS.

Vitamin B is recognized as a family comprising eight different members. All of B vitamins are water-soluble, and they are involved in various pathways of cell metabolism. Vitamin B is essential for the synthesis, replication, and repairing of nucleotides for DNA and RNA and is thus required for cell proliferation and survival. Vitamin B9 deficiency also inhibits the activity of CD8+ T cells and reduces the proliferative responses of lymphocytes and natural killer cell activity; in turn ,this inhibition is associated with decreased resistance to infections. Consequently, vitamin B6 deficiency leads to various impairments of immunity, such as lymphoid atrophy and reduced numbers of lymphocytes (3); conversely, vitamin B6 supplementation bolsters these weakened immune responses. Like vitamin B6, vitamin B9 (also known as folate and folic acid) is essential for nucleic acid and protein synthesis,91 and in adequate levels of vitamin B9 dramatically alter the immune response. Among the vitamins B, vitamin B6 is essential for metabolism of nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids and thus influences cell growth Vitamin B9 is derived from both diet and commensal bacteria.92 Additionally, the vitamin B9 receptor folate receptor 4 (FR4) is both a marker of Treg cells and is immunologically functional.93

Folate receptor 4, a vitamin B9 receptor, is highly expressed on the surfaces of Treg cells, implying a specific function of this vitamin in these cells. In particular, recent study revealed that vitamin B9 is crucial in the maintenance of Treg cells. In the absence of vitamin B9, naive Tcells can differentiate in to Treg cells, but differentiated Treg cells fail to survive owing to the decreased expression of anti-apoptotic molecules (Bcl-2).93,94

A recent study demonstrated an additional function of the vitamin B family in the control of immune responses via mucosa- associated invariant T (MAIT) cells. MAIT cells are unconventional T cells that express a semi-invariant αβ T cell receptor that is restricted by the MHC class I-related molecule MR1. These cells are mostly found in the intestine, liver, and lung.65 Because MAIT cells can react rapidly to bacterial infections (e.g. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma tuberculosis), it was supposed that the antigen presented to MR1 was bacteria-derived molecules. However, a recent study clarified that, in fact, bacterially produced metabolites of vitamin B9 and vitamin B2 bound to MR1 are presented as antigen to MAIT cells. Furthermore, like vitamin B2 derivatives, the vitamin B9 metabolite, and 6-formyl pterin. (6-FP) bind to MR1 but, unlike vitamin B2 derivatives, fails to activate MAIT cells.96 These findings suggest that, depending on their metabolism by commensal bacteria and presentation by MR1, members of the vitamin B family can act either as positive or negative regulatory ligands for MAIT cells.97



Clinical evidence has long indicated that in adequate vitamin intake disrupts host immunity. Thus, they predispose humans to infectious and inflammatory diseases. Accumulating evidence has revealed the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying myriad functions of vitamins in innate and acquired immune responses. Growing interest exists in the physiologic role of vitamin D as an essential mediator in maintaining a healthy and functional immune system. The active form of vitamin D 1,25(OH)2D3 influences innate and adaptive immunity. It acts on APCs and T cells to promote peripheral tolerance via inhibition of inflammatory responses and induction of Tregs. Vitamin B9 is crucial for the maintenance of Treg cells. Intriguingly, vitamin B9 was required for the survival of differentiated Treg cells, but was not necessary for the differentiation of naive T cells into Treg cells. As the mechanism of FR4-mediated Treg-cell maintenance, scientists considered initially that the proliferative activity of Treg cells could require large amounts of vitamin B9 as a source of nucleotides for DNA and RNA. However, the amounts of intracellular vitamin B9 were identical between Treg and non-Treg cells, implying that FR4 specifically recognizes extracellular vitamin B9 for the maintenance of Treg cell survival, consistent with a report that FR4 expressed on Treg cells contributes to their immune function and survival. The complex functions of vitamins in the regulation of the immune system efforts likely will enable scientists to refine our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the immunologic roles of various vitamins and to advance the development of vitamin-dependent therapeutic agents for the control of infectious and immune diseases. These findings clarify the beneficial roles of vitamins in the maintenance of immunologic homeostasis and inform the design of vitamin analogs as pharmacologic agents for the generation and maintenance of a healthy immune condition.



The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.



We are grateful to thank all people who kindly helped us in conducting this research.

1.Bhaskaram P. Micronutrient malnutrition, infection, and immunity: an overview. Nutr Rev. 2002; 60(5 Pt 2): S40-5. 
2.Kim W, Lee H. Advances in nutritional research on regulatory T-cells. Nutrients. 2013; 5(11): 4305-15. 
3.Kunisawa J, Kiyono H. Vitamin-mediated regulation of intestinal immunity. Front Immunol. 2013; 4: 189. 
4.Chowdhury R, Kunutsor S, Vitezova A, Oliver-Williams C, Chowdhury S, Kiefte-de-Jong JC, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. BMJ. 2014; 348: g1903. 
5.Bikle DD. Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Chem Biol. 2014; 21(3): 319-29. 
6.Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Giovannucci E, Feldman BJ. The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014; 14(5): 342-57. 
7.Kongsbak M, Levring TB, Geisler C, von Essen MR. The vitamin d receptor and T cell function. Front Immunol. 2013; 4: 148. 
8.Aranow C. Vitamin D and the immune system. J Investig Med. 2011; 59(6): 881-6. 
9.Norman AW. From vitamin D to hormone D: fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system essential for good health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88(2): 491S-9S. 
10.Jeffery LE, Wood AM, Qureshi OS, Hou TZ, Gardner D, Briggs Z, et al. Availability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to APCs controls the balance between regulatory and inflammatory T cell responses. J Immunol. 2012; 189(11): 5155-64.
11.Bikle DD. Vitamin D and the skin: Physiology and pathophysiology. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2012; 13(1): 3-19. 
12.Di Rosa M, Malaguarnera M, Nicoletti F, Malaguarnera L. Vitamin D3: a helpful immuno-modulator. Immunology. 2011; 134(2): 123-39. 
13.Heaney RP. Vitamin D--baseline status and effective dose. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(1): 77-8. 
14.Baeke F, Takiishi T, Korf H, Gysemans C, Mathieu C. Vitamin D: modulator of the immune system. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010; 10(4): 482-96. 
15.Chun RF, Lauridsen AL, Suon L, Zella LA, Pike JW, Modlin RL, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein directs monocyte responses to 25-hydroxy- and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(7): 3368-76. 
16.Haussler MR, Jurutka PW, Mizwicki M, Norman AW. Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated actions of 1alpha, 25(OH)2 vitamin D3: genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 25(4): 543-59. 
17.Rochel N, Wurtz JM, Mitschler A, Klaholz B, Moras D. The crystal structure of the nuclear receptor for vitamin D bound to its natural ligand. Mol Cell. 2000; 5(1): 173-9. 
18.Meyer MB, Goetsch PD, Pike JW. Genome-wide analysis of the VDR/RXR cistrome in osteoblast cells provides new mechanistic insight into the actions of the vitamin D hormone. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 121(1-2): 136-41. 
19.Meyer MB, Goetsch PD, Pike JW. VDR/RXR and TCF4/beta-catenin cistromes in colonic cells of colorectal tumor origin: impact on c-FOS and c-MYC gene expression. Mol Endocrinol. 2012; 26(1): 37-51. 
20.Koeffler HP, Amatruda T, Ikekawa N, Kobayashi Y, DeLuca HF. Induction of macrophage differentiation of human normal and leukemic myeloid stem cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its fluorinated analogues. Cancer Res. 1984; 44(12 Pt 1): 5624-8. 
21.Hewison M, Freeman L, Hughes SV, Evans KN, Bland R, Eliopoulos AG, et al. Differential regulation of vitamin D receptor and its ligand in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2003; 170(11): 5382-90. 
22.Kreutz M, Andreesen R, Krause SW, Szabo A, Ritz E, Reichel H. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 production and vitamin D3 receptor expression are developmentally regulated during differentiation of human monocytes into macrophages. Blood. 1993; 82(4): 1300-7. 
23.Liu PT, Stenger S, Li H, Wenzel L, Tan BH, Krutzik SR, et al. Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science. 2006; 311(5768): 1770-3. 
24.Wang TT, Nestel FP, Bourdeau V, Nagai Y, Wang Q, Liao J, et al. Cutting edge: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is a direct inducer of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. J Immunol. 2004; 173(5): 2909-12. 
25.Gombart AF, Borregaard N, Koeffler HP. Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor and is strongly up-regulated in myeloid cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. FASEB J. 2005; 19(9): 1067-77. 
26.Stoffels K, Overbergh L, Giulietti A, Verlinden L, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. Immune regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3-1alpha-hydroxylase in human monocytes. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21(1): 37-47. 
27.Krutzik SR, Hewison M, Liu PT, Robles JA, Stenger S, Adams JS, et al. IL-15 links TLR2/1-induced macrophage differentiation to the vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial pathway. J Immunol. 2008; 181(10): 7115-20.
28.Peric M, Koglin S, Kim SM, Morizane S, Besch R, Prinz JC, et al. IL-17A enhances vitamin D3-induced expression of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide in human keratinocytes. J Immunol. 2008; 181(12): 8504-12. 
29.Yim S, Dhawan P, Ragunath C, Christakos S, Diamond G. Induction of cathelicidin in normal and CF bronchial epithelial cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3). J Cyst Fibros. 2007; 6(6): 403-10. 
30.Schauber J, Dorschner RA, Yamasaki K, Brouha B, Gallo RL. Control of the innate epithelial antimicrobial response is cell-type specific and dependent on relevant microenvironmental stimuli. Immunology. 2006; 118(4): 509-19. 
31.Schauber J, Dorschner RA, Coda AB, Buchau AS, Liu PT, Kiken D, et al. Injury enhances TLR2 function and antimicrobial peptide expression through a vitamin D-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(3): 803-11. 
32.Hewison M. Vitamin D and the immune system: new perspectives on an old theme. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010; 39(2): 365-79. 
33.Dam TN, Moller B, Hindkjaer J, Kragballe K. The vitamin D3 analog calcipotriol suppresses the number and antigen-presenting function of Langerhans cells in normal human skin. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 1996; 1(1): 72-7. 
34.Ferreira GB, Vanherwegen AS, Eelen G, Gutierrez AC, Van Lommel L, Marchal K, et al. Vitamin D3 Induces Tolerance in Human Dendritic Cells by Activation of Intracellular Metabolic Pathways. Cell Rep. 2015; 10(5): 711-25. 
35.Sommer A, Fabri M. Vitamin D regulates cytokine patterns secreted by dendritic cells to promote differentiation of IL-22-producing T cells. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6): e0130395. 
36.Barragan M, Good M, Kolls JK. Regulation of Dendritic Cell Function by Vitamin D. Nutrients. 2015; 7(9): 8127-51. 
37.Urry Z, Chambers ES, Xystrakis E, Dimeloe S, Richards DF, Gabrysova L, et al. The role of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and cytokines in the promotion of distinct Foxp3+ and IL10+ CD4+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2012; 42(10): 2697-708. 
38.Fritsche J, Mondal K, Ehrnsperger A, Andreesen R, Kreutz M. Regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1a-hydroxylase and production of 1a, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by human dendritic cells. Blood. 2003; 102(9): 3314-6. 
39.Chang JH, Cha HR, Lee DS, Seo KY, Kweon MN. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits the differentiation and migration of T(H)17 cells to protect against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. PloS one. 2010; 5(9): e12925. 
40.Hayes CE, Hubler SL, Moore JR, Barta LE, Praska CE, Nashold FE. Vitamin D Actions on CD4+ T Cells in Autoimmune Disease. Front Immunol. 2015; 6: 100. 
41.Mahon BD, Wittke A, Weaver V, Cantorna MT. The targets of vitamin D depend on the differentiation and activation status of CD4 positive T cells. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 89(5): 922-32. 
42.Lemire JM, Adams JS, Kermani-Arab V, Bakke AC, Sakai R, Jordan SC. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 suppresses human T helper/inducer lymphocyte activity in vitro. J Immunol. 1985; 134(5): 3032-5. 
43.Cantorna MT. Mechanisms underlying the effect of vitamin D on the immune system. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010; 69(3): 286-9. 
44.Boonstra A, Barrat FJ, Crain C, Heath VL, Savelkoul HF, O'Garra A. 1alpha, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 has a direct effect on naive CD4+ T cells to enhance the development of Th2 cells. J Immunol. 2001; 167(9): 4974-80. 
45.Mowry EM, Krupp LB, Milazzo M, Chabas D, Strober JB, Belman AL, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with relapse rate in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010; 67(5): 618-24.
46.Adorini L, Penna G, Fibbi B, Maggi M. Vitamin D receptor agonists target static, dynamic, and inflammatory components of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1193: 146-52. 
47.Joshi S, Pantalena LC, Liu XK, Gaffen SL, Liu H, Rohowsky-Kochan C, et al. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 ameliorates Th17 autoimmunity via transcriptional modulation of interleukin-17A. Mol Cell Biol. 2011; 31(17): 3653-69. 
48.Jeffery LE, Burke F, Mura M, Zheng Y, Qureshi OS, Hewison M, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and IL-2 combine to inhibit T cell production of inflammatory cytokines and promote development of regulatory T cells expressing CTLA-4 and FoxP3. J Immunol. 2009; 183(9): 5458-67. 
49.Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96(1): 53-8. 
50.Yu S, Bruce D, Froicu M, Weaver V, Cantorna MT. Failure of T cell homing, reduced CD4/CD8alphaalpha intraepithelial lymphocytes, and inflammation in the gut of vitamin D receptor KO mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA. 2008; 105(52): 20834-9. 
51.Yu S, Cantorna MT. Epigenetic reduction in invariant NKT cells following in utero vitamin D deficiency in mice. J Immunol. 2011; 186(3): 1384-90. 
52.Colin EM, Asmawidjaja PS, van Hamburg JP, Mus AM, van Driel M, Hazes JM, et al. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 modulates Th17 polarization and interleukin-22 expression by memory T cells from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(1): 132-42. 
53.Keating P, Munim A, Hartmann JX. Effect of vitamin D on T-helper type 9 polarized human memory cells in chronic persistent asthma. Annals of allergy, asthma and immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014; 112(2): 154-62. 
54.Henry HL. Regulation of vitamin D metabolism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 25(4): 531-41. 
55.Joseph RW, Bayraktar UD, Kim TK, St John LS, Popat U, Khalili J, et al. Vitamin D receptor upregulation in alloreactive human T cells. Hum Immunol. 2012; 73(7): 693-8. 
56.Sigmundsdottir H, Pan J, Debes GF, Alt C, Habtezion A, Soler D, et al. DCs metabolize sunlight-induced vitamin D3 to 'program' T cell attraction to the epidermal chemokine CCL27. Nat Immunol. 2007; 8(3): 285-93. 
57.Kongsbak M, von Essen MR, Boding L, Levring TB, Schjerling P, Lauritsen JP, et al. Vitamin D up-regulates the vitamin D receptor by protecting it from proteasomal degradation in human CD4+ T cells. PloS one. 2014; 9(5): e96695. 
58.Bikle DD, Siiteri PK, Ryzen E, Haddad JG. Serum protein binding of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D: a reevaluation by direct measurement of free metabolite levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985; 61(5): 969-75. 
59.Provvedini DM, Tsoukas CD, Deftos LJ, Manolagas SC. 1 alpha, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-binding macromolecules in human B lymphocytes: effects on immunoglobulin production. J Immunol. 1986; 136(8): 2734-40. 
60.Chen S, Sims GP, Chen XX, Gu YY, Chen S, Lipsky PE. Modulatory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on human B cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2007; 179(3): 1634-47. 
61.Heine G, Niesner U, Chang HD, Steinmeyer A, Zugel U, Zuberbier T, et al. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) promotes IL-10 production in human B cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008; 38(8): 2210-8. 
62.Moroni L, Bianchi I, Lleo A. Geoepidemiology, gender and autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2012; 11(6-7): A386-92. 
63.Cantorna MT, Zhu Y, Froicu M, Wittke A. Vitamin D status, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and the immune system. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80(6): 1717S-20S. 
64.Shao T, Klein P, Grossbard ML. Vitamin D and breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012; 17(1): 36-45. 
65.Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(3): 266-81. 
66.Del Valle HB, Yaktine AL, Taylor CL, Ross AC. Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D: National Academies Press; 2011. 
67.Viswanath D. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. J Sci Innov Res. 2013; 2(3): 710-5. 
68.Sintov AC, Yarmolinsky L, Dahan A, Ben-Shabat S. Pharmacological effects of vitamin D and its analogs: recent developments. Drug Discov Today. 2014; 19(11): 1769-74. 
69.Luderer HF, Demay MB. The vitamin D receptor, the skin and stem cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 121(1-2): 314-6. 
70.Youssef DA, Miller CW, El-Abbassi AM, Cutchins DC, Cutchins C, Grant WB, et al. Antimicrobial implications of vitamin D. Dermatoendocrinol. 2011; 3(4): 220-9. 
71.Wulf HC. The relation between skin disorders and vitamin D. Br J Dermatol. 2012; 166(3): 471-2. 
72.Ben-Shabat S, Benisty R, Wormser U, Sintov AC. Vitamin D3-based conjugates for topical treatment of psoriasis: synthesis, antiproliferative activity, and cutaneous penetration studies. Pharm Res. 2005; 22(1): 50-7. 
73.Devaux S, Castela A, Archier E, Gallini A, Joly P, Misery L, et al. Adherence to topical treatment in psoriasis: a systematic literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012; 26 Suppl 3: 61-7. 
74.McCormack PL. Spotlight on calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate in psoriasis vulgaris of the trunk, limbs, and scalp. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011; 12(6): 421-4. 
75.Oquendo M, Abramovits W, Morrell P. Topical vitamin D analogs available to treat psoriasis. Skinmed. 2012; 10(6): 356-60. 
76.Berkovich L, Ben-Shabat S, Sintov AC. Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of prostate and breast cancer growth by BGP-15, a new calcipotriene-derived vitamin D3 analog. Anticancer Drugs. 2010; 21(6): 609-18. 
77.Berkovich L, Sintov AC, Ben-Shabat S. Inhibition of cancer growth and induction of apoptosis by BGP-13 and BGP-15, new calcipotriene-derived vitamin D3 analogs, in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Invest New Drugs. 2013; 31(2): 247-55. 
78.Milczarek M, Chodynski M, Filip-Psurska B, Martowicz A, Krupa M, Krajewski K, et al. Synthesis and Biological Activity of Diastereomeric and Geometric Analogs of Calcipotriol, PRI-2202 and PRI-2205, Against Human HL-60 Leukemia and MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers. 2013; 5(4): 1355-78. 
79.Slominski AT, Kim TK, Janjetovic Z, Tuckey RC, Bieniek R, Yue J, et al. 20-Hydroxyvitamin D2 is a noncalcemic analog of vitamin D with potent antiproliferative and prodifferentiation activities in normal and malignant cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011; 300(3): C526-41. 
80.Milczarek M, Rosinska S, Psurski M, Maciejewska M, Kutner A, Wietrzyk J. Combined colonic cancer treatment with vitamin D analogs and irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Anticancer Res. 2013; 33(2): 433-44. 
81.Eduardo-Canosa S, Fraga R, Sigueiro R, Marco M, Rochel N, Moras D, et al. Design and synthesis of active vitamin D analogs. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 121(1-2): 7-12. 
82.Cheung FS, Lovicu FJ, Reichardt JK. Current progress in using vitamin D and its analogs for cancer prevention and treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012; 12(6): 811-37. 
83.Chakraborti CK. Vitamin D as a promising anticancer agent. Indian J Phar. 2011; 43(2): 113. 
84.Manna P, Jain SK. Vitamin D up-regulates glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation and glucose utilization mediated by cystathionine-gamma-lyase (CSE) activation and H2S formation in 3T3L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(50): 42324-32. 
85.Kiekhaefer CM, Weber B, Huggins M, Gorichanaz C, Nehring JA, DeLuca HF. 2 alpha-Methyl-19-nor-(20S)-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 protects the insulin 2 knockout non-obese diabetic mouse from developing type 1 diabetes without hypercalcaemia. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011; 166(3): 325-32. 
86.Holick MF. Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79(3): 362-71. 
87.Pittas AG, Harris SS, Stark PC, Dawson-Hughes B. The effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose and markers of inflammation in nondiabetic adults. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(4): 980-6. 
88.Khatami M, Heidari MM, Mansouri R, Mousavi F. The POLG Polyglutamine Tract Variants in Iranian Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Iran J Child Neurol. 2015; 9(1): 37-41. 
89.Pozuelo-Moyano B, Benito-Leon J. [Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis]. Rev Neurol. 2013; 56(4): 243-51. 
90.Slavov GS, Trenova AG, Manova MG, Kostadinova, II, Vasileva TV, Zahariev ZI. Vitamin D immunomodulatory potential in multiple sclerosis. Folia Med. 2013; 55(2): 5-9. 
91.Stover PJ. Physiology of folate and vitamin B12 in health and disease. Nutr Rev. 2004; 62(6 Pt 2): S3-12; discussion S3. 
92.Villablanca EJ, Wang S, de Calisto J, Gomes DC, Kane MA, Napoli JL, et al. MyD88 and retinoic acid signaling pathways interact to modulate gastrointestinal activities of dendritic cells. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141(1): 176-85. 
93.Kunisawa J, Hashimoto E, Ishikawa I, Kiyono H. A pivotal role of vitamin B9 in the maintenance of regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo. PloS one. 2012; 7(2): e32094. 
94.Yamaguchi T, Hirota K, Nagahama K, Ohkawa K, Takahashi T, Nomura T, et al. Control of immune responses by antigen-specific regulatory T cells expressing the folate receptor. Immunity. 2007; 27(1): 145-59. 
95.Le Bourhis L, Guerri L, Dusseaux M, Martin E, Soudais C, Lantz O. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells: unconventional development and function. Trends Immunol. 2011; 32(5): 212-8. 
96.Kjer-Nielsen L, Patel O, Corbett AJ, Le Nours J, Meehan B, Liu L, et al. MR1 presents microbial vitamin B metabolites to MAIT cells. Nature. 2012; 491(7426): 717-23. 
97.Birkinshaw RW, Kjer-Nielsen L, Eckle SB, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J. MAITs, MR1 and vitamin B metabolites. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014; 26: 7-13.