Document Type : Original Article


1 Psychology Dept., Tabriz University, I.R. Iran

2 Social Health Determinants Research Center, Community Health Dept., Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, I.R. Iran.


Background and aims: Paper-pencil tests have always its own problems in the mental disorders evaluation, including learning questions, bad or good blazon are the problems with this methodology. This study aimed to propose a new alternative method of measuring mental disorders without paper-pencil test using EEG.
Methods: The research society involved depressed patients referred the psychiatrist clinics in Tabriz. 107 patients were selected as samples using a convenient sampling method. The Beck test was conducted. The EEG was recorded from the F4 point concurrent with displaying the film of 5 animated emotional images from Normed Images database (IAPS). The specialized screen of this recording was designed by the author in the Biograph Infinity software of device. Other software was written by the author in order to separate the αpeak frequency average associated with any image of the recorded EEG. Then the research variablesα1peak , α2peak , α3peak , α4peak , α5peak of each patient were analyzed with SPSS. After all, another 26 patients were selected to measure the Golden Standard, sensitivity, Positive predictability, Negative predictability and ROC.
Results: The results of the multiple regression analysis showed that α1peak associated with αpeakfrequancy of image 1 had more explanatory power with a beta value of 0.289 compared with other variables. Then α3peak had a high explanatory power. The regression equation for the predicting the score based on his/her EEG was found in terms of αpeak frequency.
Discussion: This research showed that Beck's depression score was predictable without using any questionnaire but according to EEG with a high sensitivity (100%), specificity (30.8%), PPV (59.1%), NPPV (100%), and ROC (57.4%).  


Main Subjects

1.Marks IM, Kenwright M, McDonough M, Whittaker M, Mataix-Cols D. Saving clinicians' time by delegating routine aspects of therapy to a computer: A randomized controlled trial in phobia/panic disorder. Psychol Med. 2004; 34(1):9-17.
2.Wilson FR, Genco KT, Yager GG. Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology. Comput Human Behav. 1985; 1(3): 265-75. 
3.Holden RR, Hickman D. Computerized versus standard administration of the Jenkins Activity Survey (Form T). J Human Stress. 1987; 13(4): 175-9. 
4.Merten T, Ruch W. A comparison of computerized and conventional administration of the German versions of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and the Carroll Rating Scale for Depression. Pers Individ Dif. 1996; 20(3): 281-91. 
5.Pellegrino JW, Hunt EB, Abate R, Farr S. A computer-based test battery for the assessment of static and dynamic spatial reasoning abilities. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1987; 19(2): 231-6. 
6.French CC, Beaumont JG. A clinical study of the automated assessment of intelligence by the Mill Hill Vocabulary Test and the Standard Progressive Matrices Test. J Clin Psychol. 1990; 46(2): 129-40. 
7.Aurup GM, Akgunduz A. Preference Extraction from EEG: An Approach to Aesthetic Product Development. In Proceedings of the 2012. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Istanbul, Turkey: 1178-86. 
8.Aurup GM, Akgunduz A. Pair-Wise Preference Comparisons Using Alpha-Peak Frequencies. J integr des Process Sci. 2012; 16(4): 3-18. 
9.Merkelbach H, Muris P, Horselenberg R, de Jong P. EEG correlates of a pencil and paper test measuring hemisphericity. J Clin Psychol. 1997; 57: 739-44. 
10.Davidson RJ. Emotion and affective style: Hemispheric substrates. Psychol Sci. 1992; 3(1): 39-43. 
11.Boggio PS, Bermpohl F, Vergara AO, Muniz AL, Nahas FH, Leme PB, Rigonatti SP, Fregni F. Go-no-go task performance improvement after anodal transcranial DC stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression. . J Affect Disord. 2007; 101(1-3): 91-8. 
12.Nitsche MA, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A review. Exp Neurol. 2009; 219(1): 14-9. 
13.Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory-II M. San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia: The Psychological Corporation; 1996. 
14.Nitsche MA, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review. Bipolar Disord. 2006; 8(2): 203-4. 
15.Begum S, Ahmed MU, Funk P, Xiong N, Von Schéele B. A case based decision support system for individual stress diagnosis using fuzzy similarity matching. Comput Intell. 2009; 25(3): 180-95.