Document Type : Brief Communication


1 Student Research Committee, School of Paramedical Sciences, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

2 School of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Toxicology–Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

4 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran


Background and aims: Patient information leaflets (PILs) are the best form of written information transfer. The aim of this study was to investigate the sources of drug information and the reading rate of PILs among medical sciences students.
Methods: Three hundred students were entered in this cross-sectional study via simple random sampling at the Faculty of Paramedical, Nursing and Midwifery of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2018.
Results: The participants considered the physician as the most reliable source for receiving drug information. Pharmacists, PILs, and the Internet were mentioned as the next sources, respectively. About 15.3% of people always read PILs. Students used PILs along with other sources of drug information.
Conclusion: The type of medication and the individuals’ need for the type of information, along with the structure and presentation of the materials in the PILs, are all contributing factors.


Main Subjects

1. Herber OR, Gies V, Schwappach D, Thürmann P, Wilm S. Patient information leaflets: informing or frightening? a focus group study exploring patients’ emotional reactions and subsequent behavior towards package leaflets of commonly prescribed medications in family practices. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-163. 
2. Nader F, Mousavizadeh K, Ghafourifar P. Patient sources for drug information in Iran: a questionnaire-based survey. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(6):764-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008- 9254-z. 
3. Grime J, Blenkinsopp A, Raynor DK, Pollock K, Knapp P. The role and value of written information for patients about individual medicines: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2007;10(3):286-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00454.x. 
4. Kairuz T, Bye L, Birdsall R, Deng T, Man L, Ross A, et al. Identifying compliance issues with prescription medicines among older people: a pilot study. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(2):153-62. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825020-00007. 
5. Holappa M, Ahonen R, Vainio K, Hämeen-Anttila K. Information sources used by parents to learn about medications they are giving their children. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8(6):579- 84. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.01.003. 
6. Nathan JP, Zerilli T, Cicero LA, Rosenberg JM. Patients’ use and perception of medication information leaflets. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(5):777-82. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H686. 
7. Bailey SC, Navaratnam P, Black H, Russell AL, Wolf MS. Advancing best practices for prescription drug labeling. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49(11):1222-36. doi: 10.1177/1060028015602272. 
8. Al-Aqeel SA. Evaluation of medication package inserts in Saudi Arabia. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2012;4:33-8. doi: 10.2147/ dhps.s29402. 
9. Zarghami M, Azari A, Ghasemi S, Hormozpour M, Hendouei N. Availability of drug key information on package inserts of psychiatric drugs manufactured in Iranian pharmaceutical companies. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2016;22(2):122-33. [Persian]. 
10. Dickinson R, Hamrosi K, Knapp P, Aslani P, Sowter J, Krass I, et al. Suits you? a qualitative study exploring preferences regarding the tailoring of consumer medicines information. Int J Pharm Pract. 2013;21(4):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.2042- 7174.2012.00252.x. 
11. Fuchs J. The way forward in package insert user tests from a CRO’s perspective. Drug Inf J. 2010;44(2):119-29. doi: 10.1177/009286151004400203. 
12. Burgers C, Beukeboom CJ, Sparks L, Diepeveen V. How (not) to inform patients about drug use: use and effects of negations in Dutch patient information leaflets. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(2):137-43. doi: 10.1002/pds.3679. 
13. Luk A, Tasker N, Raynor DK, Aslani P. Written medicine information from English-speaking countries--how does it compare? Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(2):285-94. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M402. 
14. Närhi U. Sources of medicine information and their reliability evaluated by medicine users. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29(6):688-94. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9131-1. 
15. Young A, Tordoff J, Smith A. ‘What do patients want?’ tailoring medicines information to meet patients’ needs. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13(6):1186-90. doi: 10.1016/j. sapharm.2016.10.006.